One thing that really grinds my gears is dumb comments about the last 50 years of Canadian history, like this one. Progress is not measured in steel and concrete, in my opinion.
Yes, there were many great things about Montreal leading up to the 1976 Olympic Games. Yes, there are still many fabulous things about Quebec’s real capital. And yes, Toronto has earned its title of Queen City: its growth is phenomenal. That’s a good thing for everyone - Ontario and Quebec are peas in a pod, whether you like it or not.
###
At the time of Expo 67, 240,000 Montrealers were illiterate, 1 in 3 people lived in a slum without a bathtub or shower, and infants living in the slums were seven times more likely to die*. Quebec didn’t even have a Ministry of Education until 1964. Montreal of yore was morally and socially unsustainable. It’s quite amazing that, despite everything, so many Canadians actually really don’t understand the context of the last 50 years of national history. Is it any surprise that it’s taken one or two generations of Montrealers to recover from those conditions? Isn’t it great that poverty eradication and social equity are still number one on the political agenda for Montrealers and Quebecers?
The on-going social recovery is all the more incredible in light of the fact that a huge part of the Montreal’s economy was based on industry. From the sewing of clothes to the construction of trains, it was done here. Many factories have gone to “lower cost” countries over the past 30 years, but they’ve left traces in our society and in our soil. We must acknowledge that political instability has a negative effect on economic growth. But the economic changes in Montreal are also attribuable to a greater change in the economies of developed countries generally. People forget that Montreal was amongst the first cities to enter the industrial and then the modern era - it’s normal that we’d also be amongst the first to enter post-modernity. Post-modernity is, amongst other things, about challenging the assumptions regarding what socio-economic development is and how it should be achieved.
Another thing that is special about Quebec - it is one of the few places in the world where virtually everybody has had the experience of being discriminated against as a minority. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why Quebec leads the world in human rights legislation. On that note, let’s briefly address language legislation, which is in fact part of a much broader initiative to protect people’s rights. There are some highly questionable and tokenistic regulations in Law 101 and especially in its application. But there are also many regulations that are in fact quite justified - for example, that people should be entitled to negotiate their working conditions and have their contracts drawn up in French. Does the hassle of translation dissuade companies from setting up here? Yes. But what kind of companies do we want to work for? In the context given above, it is any surprise that the development and implementation of such legislation would be politically difficult and fraught with problems? And why hasn’t federal legislation to mirror the fairer parts of Law 101 been adopted?
Finally, while it is important to acknowledge, the great exodus story of recent history is not that of English-speakers moving a few hundred kilometres west. It is the exodus of tens of thousands of people - of many different cultural backgrounds - from poverty. The rise of “Quebec Inc.” That is truly the magnificent achievement of Montreal.
###
* Statistics taken from the Senate’s Poverty Committee and published in the Vancouver Sun. Thanks to Kristian Gravesnor of Coolopolis for the reference. First image created by an unknown artist. Second image taken from: MIKA, John, “Behind the unrest: Life in poverty,” The Vancouver Sun, October 29, 1970. The article is very interesting. I would love to read a full copy of the Senate committee’s report. If anyone is able to send me a copy, that would be very much appreciated. I am also keen to learn more about the history of poverty and social development in Toronto. Thanks also to Steve Galluccio for his critique of the first image and for inspiring this article.
One of the best things about Quebec is we always end up laughing about our crazy politics… and things have been particularly bizarre lately…
Sexual Politics in the Streets of Outremont, Montreal
The sign says “A woman talking on her phone whilst walking in the street is a missed opportunity for a man to greet her.”
Personally, I don’t believe women should prepare to be solicited every moment they are in public, to keep themselves available for every interested man. What do you think?
Canada has a peculiar twist on multiculturalism: unlike the idea of a “melting-pot” that most “New World” countries refer to, in Canada we often talk about a mosaic, or to be more specific, “Trudeau’s mosaic / la mosaïque trudeauiste.” Pierre-Elliott Trudeau was the prime minister of Canada at a time of great modernisation, which included a major effort to make the country much more democratic and egalitarian. He is widely regarded as the leading contributor to Canada’s Constitution.

Trudeau, in a moment of joy over patriation of Canada’s constitution, performed his now famous pirouette at Uplands Airport here 4/18 /82 following the Queens’s departure for London after the 4-day state visit which climaxed with the proclamation of the Constitution Act, 1982. (CP Photo/Andy Clark). Source.
Although he didn’t come up with the metaphor, wandering around the streets of Canada’s major cities, and especially Montreal, it’s easy to see why the concept would appeal to this Pine Avenue resident: from one block to another, Montrealers draw mental borders based on language, religion, ethnicity and, of course, social class. Then there is the overlay of the “Two Solitudes,” a vision of Canada whereby English-speakers and French-speakers do not take interest in each others’ point of view, much less interact with it. Finally, we have our fractured federal system.
The idea of a mosaic may have been appropriate in the 20th century, but is it today? Again, walking around Montreal, you will still see and hear people of different cultural communities, but the vast majority of these communities do not huddle away. Just in terms of language alone - our favourite point of reference - 120 different mother tongues are spoken in this city. The fact that Canada’s second largest city is the most multilingual metropolis in North America speaks for itself. In most of the rest of the country, where Canadian bilingualism is on much less of an even footing, the mosaic metaphor is even less pertinent.
Perhaps Trudeau was particularly keen to minimise accusations of pushing an assimilation agenda as he encouraged Canadian bilingualism. One of the many links between the movements to protect the French language and for Quebec sovereignty is the threat of being folded into English-speaking Canada, much like other cultural minority currently are. This threat does in fact have a historical root in actual Canadian policy: the 1838 Durham Report.
On that note, let’s take a step back and think about what a mosaic is. Colourful tiles that are not usually particularly valuable or meaningful when taken alone, but when pushed and cemented together, they form a magnificent vision. However, if the mosaic is not carefully maintained, mold and bacteria will infiltrate, the cement will eventually crumble, and pieces will begin to fall off. Maybe Trudeau was right after all.

“It’s official: Canada has lost its cool factor.” Source: Colin Frizzell.
Above: Prime Minister Pierre-Elliott Trudeau (Quebec), father of official bilingualism (amongst many other things), with John Lennon and Yoko Ono, after the “bed-in for peace” at the Queen Elizabeth Hotel in Montreal.
Below: Prime Minister Stephen Harper (Ontario/Alberta), father of … well we’re not sure yet, with Justin Bieber in Ottawa.
Fuck Yeah Quebec doesn’t believe Canada has lost its cool factor: it’s just been overshadowed by Nickelback, Tim Hortons and other blithe pop culture artefacts. Hopefully the federal government will recentre its cultural policy on what makes this country truly unique, exciting, and a great global citizen.
Original photo credits: Above - Peter Bregg, Canadian Press. Below - Government of Canada.
According to FY Jacques Chirac, here is the former president of France in 1992. He appears to be in Montreal: if the architecture isn’t a give away, the “à louer” sign is for sure. According to a Plateau Mont-Royal document that now only exists as a google webcache, he came here around that time to inaugurate this monument to Charles de Gaulle on Sherbrooke Street East, a gift from the City of Paris to Montreal on the occasion of the 350th anniversary of the city’s foundation. Chirac was a protégé of de Gaulle and (obviously) a member of the same political family.
I have to admit, I’ve walked past it a million times and had no idea what it was (and even less curiosity to find out.) The Union Gaulliste de France puts it very diplomatically:
Il est légitime de se demander si l’art abstrait n’avait pas ses limites dans la représentation du témoignage de respect, d’admiration et de reconnaissance, surtout quand on parle de l’art public.
“It is legitimate to question whether or not abstract art is limited with regards to the expression of respect, admiration and recognition, especially when it appears as public art.”
Of course, the purpose of the monument may have intentionally been obscured for political reasons. Charles de Gaulle is a very controversial figure in terms of the relations between France and Canada, having declared in 1967, from no less of a pulpit than the balcony of the city hall of the country’s largest metropolis “Vive le Québec libre!” (To which of course Prime Minister Pearson retorted “Canadians do not need to be liberated.”)
Ever since that incident, the Government of France’s official position on the issue has been “non-interference, non-indifference.” As for Canadians’ opinions on the question, 1992 was four years before the most recent sovereignty referendum…
Quebec Elections 2012 - An Anglo’s Guide. Happy voting!
To make it even more simpler for you:
The nice thing about this election is that there are for the first time two viable options for each constitutional preference.
This article is the result of special collaboration with Apartment 613, an Ottawa-based entertainment and lifestyle blog and radio show. Reviews of restaurants, bars and shops visited on the research trip and a copy of Fuck Yeah Gatineau broadcast on CHUO will soon be made available on their website.
Sometimes you’ll see the expression “Québec-Canada” written: it’s usually not a redundancy, but rather a codeword that suggests Quebec and Canada are on the same standing and that reveals the political aspirations of the person or institution using it. It is shorthand for everything and anything associated with the Quebec sovereignty-association movement, including the questioning of the distribution of wealth in Canada, the idea that Quebec is French-speaking and the rest of Canada is not, and the belief that government intervention can fix everything. FuckYeahQuebec.com doesn’t get into politics - especially not language or constitutional politics - but when you’re talking about Gatineau, the province’s third largest city, it’s hard not to.

The Gatineau region seen from Ontario, with Ottawa in foreground. Credit: Daniel Raillant-Clark
Gatineau implies Ottawa. Even if you tried your hardest (and many people in Quebec do), you can’t ignore the fact that these are twin cities, in an albeit almost false sense of the term. Ottawa, the oft-overlooked epicenter of British North American politics, positioned on a princely precipice overlooking the Outaouais or Ottawa River, a spot chosen by Queen Victoria herself. Canada’s masterpiece looks sideways at Gatineau, a muddle of municipalities merged in the 2000s in a rush of modernisation managed in the best revolution tranquille style (i.e. top-down), of which the former city of Hull was and is the most known and identifiable place. More important than the physical barrier that separates the two is the psychological one that overlays it: the national-provincial border.
The gorgeous lookouts along the Ottawa side offer the opportunity to gaze upon Hull, and from this angle you can admire a façade of effectively nameless and monolithic modernists hulks nay hives for federal employees. In other words, it looks like the Upper Canada side. In other words, this poised glimpse of Quebec doesn’t really reveal anything about what Gatineau is or was.

Gatineau seen from Ottawa. Credit: CBC.
It is in fact very easy to walk or cycle across one of the bridges to get a proper look, but despite claims to the contrary, your correspondent gets the feeling that not many tourists do (other than to perhaps visit one of the federal museums slotted along the river bank.) Crossing the Portage or Booth Street bridges takes you through the ruins of the Domtar (Dominion Tar) paper mill, an echoing introduction to the “have-not” half of Canada’s National Capital Region.

Hull sector of Gatineau, Quebec. Credit: Daniel Raillant-Clark
Domtar these days is effectively owned by the Government of Quebec and has its headquarters in Montreal, which seems strangely appropriate as the way Hull and Ottawa operate today evokes stories of Montreal of yore, where English, money and a form of secularism reigned in the Western half of the city, and French, labour and catholic mysticism dominated life in the East. “We’re in Quebec now, we should speak French,” I overheard. Not many English-speaking Quebecers would favour that sharp dissection of our social and physical geography, and not many French-speaking federalists would appreciate the non-dit implication (that Ottawa is for speaking English.)

Hull sector of Gatineau, Quebec. Credit: Daniel Raillant-Clark
In any event, Hull does feel like the Eastern part of Montreal, and in particular the areas around the Port of Montreal and the Molson Brewery: small apartment blocks and homes clustered as closely as practicable to industry. It in fact looks poorer, but it does not have the sometimes menacing atmosphere created by Hochelaga-Maisonneuve’s sex and drug trade. On the contrary, in fact. The strip on rue Eddy, with its lively bars and restaurants strangely shoved into awkwardly adapted buildings, is an incredibly, honestly and earnestly warm, welcoming, and unpretentious place to be. A great place to get started and make a friend is the Café aux Quatre jeudis. Welcome to Quebec.

Aux quatre jeudis with federal government buildings in the background. Credit: Jean-Sébastien Chevrier
Both the Federal and Provincial Governments have taken turns altering the hemlines and seams of the Gatineau region’s urban fabric, each in their own very specific way. The Federal government’s plonked installations look and act more or less like UFOs, settled on planet Quebec with the intention of increasing the border region’s economic (and ergo political) dependence on the Confederation. And the Government of Quebec has tried with the stroke of a distant pen to contrive community where there is none, yet another failed call to unity in order to achieve a mystical and blurry immediate-yet-unattainable goal. In other words, the layout of Gatineau is unnatural, and so the city’s gems are scattered about much like proverbial diamonds in the rough. Apartment 613 offers reviews of some of these hidden pearls - in particular, your correspondent recommends the gourmet ice-cream sandwiches chez Edgar, which can only be described as orgasmically satisfying.

“Odile”, an excellent gourmet restaurant owned and managed by the same chef as “Edgar”, co-habitates in a former house with second-hand appliance store. Credit: Daniel Raillant-Clark
Quebec’s relationship with Ontario, English-speakers relationships with francophones, and Gatineau’s relationship with Ottawa are incredibly more complex, sophisticated and dynamic than the red-blue tit-for-tat all-or-nothing dichotomy that continues to exist in the popular collective imagination of many French-speaking Quebecers and anglophone Ontarians. And so it is with Gatineau itself: beyond the Hull neighbourhood is a wonderful mix of stunning nature, storied history and multicultural suburbs. Gatineau is blessed with the Gatineau River, of which the “Queen’s chain” forms a stunning and massive wildlife park, driven like a wedge into the heart of urban sprawl. Following the river up in to the mountains brings the explorer to Old Chelsea and then Wakefield, two delightful, bilingual villages nestled into the unspoiled wilderness that surrounds them that are renown for their cultural vibrancy and historical heritage.

Wakefield, Quebec and the Gatineau River. Credit: Daniel Raillant-Clark
Gatineau is all too often ignored by Ontarians as being too much of the “other” and reviled by Quebecers for more-or-less the same reason (with a healthy dose of stereotypes about government towns thrown in for good measure). In your correspondent’s opinion, that’s a damn shame because Gatineau and the communities it represents have a lot to offer Quebec and Canada. What’s your opinion?
Canada’s diversity and efforts to reach out to the less fortunate around the world are a key part of our identity. The most eloquent echo of these cultural cornerstones -Radio Canada International - is being silenced by brutal and needless cuts.
Radio Canada International is the international services unit of CBC-Société Radio-Canada. Very shortly, it will be amputated of some of the languages that it broadcasts and most shockingly, its short-wave radio broadcasts. This is due to budget cuts that were adopted by the Federal Government of Canada. Short-wave radio is important because unlike FM or AM radio, it can be heard anywhere in the world, if the weather conditions are right.
Radio-Canada International is based at the CBC’s Montreal headquarters - the Maison Radio-Canada.
Do you believe that international public broadcasting is important? That the voice of democracy should be heard by those muzzled by their governments? That the light of freedom should offer a glimmer of hope to those who live in the darkest of circumstances? SUPPORT Radio Canada International and the Radio Canada International Action Committee (RCI Action Committee).
Fuck Yeah Quebec believes that RCI’s linguistic diversity is the most eloquent reflection of our own cultural mosaic and an integral part of the image Canadians should be projecting abroad. Fuck Yeah Quebec also thinks that solidarity with people living in poverty stricken and anti-democratic countries is one of the most wonderful aspects of Canadian culture.